Of late, ACN scam stories have aired in the business world and media. Just like various Internet scams have created huge controversies, ACN is another marketing company that has gained media attention. In your endeavor to discover the truth behind, 'is ACN Scam or legitimate business idea', you have reached this article that is going to give you the exact picture behind ACN Scam, as it has been alleged in the media.
What is ACN? ACN is a telecommunication firm founded in the year 1993 by Greg Provenzano, Robert Stevanovski, Mike Cupisz, and Anthony Cupisz. This company is based in North Carolina and was formerly known as American Corporation. It operates in about 18 countries and 3 continents across the globe. This company majors in direct telecommunication selling products and boasts itself to be the biggest company ever of this sector, in the world. This firm provides services like long distance calling, internet, wireless phone services, home security kits and satellite TVs. As technology advances, we can expect some more latest features to be made available by them. ACN got a major boost when it was aired on its website that the corporate big wig Donald Trump was personally endorsing the firm. ACN's co-founders Greg Provenzano and Tony Cupisz, along with Donlad Trump appeared on the television show, The Celebrity Apprentice to promote ACN. Still, after Donald himself endorsing ACN network, that is definitely a huge endorsement, given the stature of Donald in US corporate, many people were not satisfied with the firm's policies. ACN Scam Review Firstly, it seems that there are least chances of ACN Scam, owing to the fact it has some unique business plans in the multi-level marketing (MLM) industry. The firm is very open towards its customers when it comes to selling products. The company offers you home based business opportunities. You can work at your home and hence, you'll be able to save money by owning a home office, one of the positives about doing this business. Since this firm uses principles of generating MLM leads when it comes to expanding their business, it follows a pyramid scheme of business. Now, one interesting thing to consider is that till date, almost all pyramid scheme businesses have been in controversies. In such types of business plans, it's alleged that somehow, those at the top of ladder are the ones who get benefited most. Although, this may seem a simple home based business opportunity, it may eventually require you to pay a renewal fee of US$149 (as per various sources) per year, besides a US$10 plus per month in other fees. And many people have complained that you're not informed about this until you've signed up for the subscription. Besides that, you may have to pay fee for ordering their marketing kit. Nevertheless, nothing can be said unless you meet and inquire people who've been through this network marketing company. Lastly, various lawsuits filed by some people in various places have made ACN scam a possibility. Hence, we need to take care of the fact that MLM marketing is not ideal for everyone, especially if someone has no idea about this business. So, if someone enters this marketing plan without any guide, he may eventually end up making no money. If you're not sure whether you should join this business opportunity or you should ask your friends to become one of its member, you should first of all, understand MLM marketing and pyramid scheme types of businesses. Secondly, doing proper research on the internet can help you to be more ACN aware about the truth. http://www.buzzle.com/articles/acn-scam.html
0 Comments
The education system in India, set into motion under British rulers, is the single biggest reason why the problem of outsourcing jobs to this third world country is becoming such a bone of contention in the US today.
Indian students are drilled with information, stuffed with English language skills (indeed, in India educated means English speaking), and converted into veritable encyclopedia on two legs. They may lose the ability to think out of the box in many cases, but they get to sharpen their knowledge skills, and software is one such. As a result, today India produces 3.1 million college graduates a year, and the number will be close to 7 million in another six years. The number of engineering colleges is slated to grow 50%, to nearly 1,600, in four years. Of course, the engineers thus produced may not be world-class, but they are skilled engineers nevertheless, and can be trained to the best advantage. Slowly but surely, the land of snake charmers and fakirs has started catching the attention of cyberspace, more so highly skilled levels of workers. Migration is not easy, so as per the phrase 'the mountain comes to Mohammed', outsourcing is what follows. With amazing speed and efficiency, India and its young brains are making deep forays into world-class engineering, business and medical sciences industries. The impact has been stronger than most Americans could imagine possible. "India has always had brilliant, educated people," says tech-trend forecaster Paul Saffo of the Institute for the Future in Menlo Park, Calif. "Now Indians are taking the lead in colonizing cyberspace." This techno takeoff is a great idea for India, its economy as well as society, but seems to have shaken the foundations of the American faith in their superiority. The storm that is brewing, is taking over the American vote bank faster than politicians can fight it, so much so that it is now taking center stage for this year's elections. According to projections by A.T. Kearney Inc., 500,000 financial-services jobs will go offshore by 2008. India gets almost 60% of all outsourcing jobs. Indian brainpower is increasingly being utilized to manage everything from accounting to their food-stamp programs; the latest entrant is the U.S. Postal Service! At this point, statistics say that almost a third of the new IT development work for big US companies is being done overseas, and bulk of it in India. As a result, Bangalore alone today has a hundred and fifty thousand IT engineers, about thirty thousand more than Silicon Valley. More forecasts by McKinsey state that by 2008, IT services and back-office work in India will grow five times, to a $57 billion annual export industry employing 4 million people and accounting for 7% of India's gross domestic product. And this is not even considering the cream of the educated workers who will choose not to work as outsourced personnel. By 2020, 47% of Indians will be between 15 and 59, compared with 35% now. The working-age populations of the U.S. and China are projected to shrink. So India is destined to have the world's largest population of workers and consumers. That's a big reason why Goldman, Sachs & Co. thinks India will be able to sustain 7.5% annual rate of growth after 2005. The first reason for this is the fact that this skill comes at a fraction of the cost in the US. A top chemical or electrical engineer from one of the Indian IITs gets a starting salary of $10,000 a year, while a similar American employee will get about $80,000. With this kind of economics at play, this seems to be best place to squeeze profits from. Besides, big US companies are, at this point, getting rid of almost 500 to 2000 IT staffers because of their inability to update their skills, or their packages. This is where Indian brains move in for the kill. China, the other Asian tiger, somehow does not seem to be a real threat to this field. Maybe it is because of the English skills that India boasts of, despite the fact that the Chinese economic liberalization began almost 12 years before India opened up in 1991. It was actually only in 1999 that Indian software got their big break, with the likes of Infosys, Tata, and Wipro getting their big breaks during the Y2K scare, when U.S. outfits needed all the software help they could get. Though India still has cornered only less than 3% of the market, it has definitely changed the market appearance, the pricing structure by undercutting options like Accenture, IBM, and Electronic Data Systems by a third or more. The reaction from the American workforce has been instant and uproarious. Politicians are starting to view outsourcing as a threat to the economy, the worker unions are viewing it as a threat to their bread and butter and the government is in a spot, because the issue has become an election gimmick now. Figures say that due to outsourcing, the rate of unemployment among software engineers in the US has more than doubled over the last two years, to 4.6%. The same applies to chemical and electrical engineers. In total, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 234,000 IT professionals are unemployed. Today, like it or not, almost two-thirds of the Fortune 500 companies are outsourcing from India, and corporate America is not in a position to overlook the implications. According to Forrester Research, the amount of work done for America, out of India, is expected to more than double this year. It is a great economic option but a greater employment threat, at least to a part of the country. There are frantic moves, political lobbying, and all sorts of logic put forward to thwart the growing trend. There are arguments that there still exists a cultural lacunae, service level expectations are supposedly, still not met and the transitional costs can be foreboding. While these things may sound like real issues, in the face of billions of dollars worth of savings, they appear insignificant. Besides, outsourcing will benefit the US economy, because companies will now be investing greater savings in other job-creating activities, which will more than negate the number of jobs lost to India. In any case, the number of jobs lost is only a very small fraction of the 138 million-labor ACN force. But this small crumb of the pie, has the power to impart a growth rate of 8% to the Indian economy. In a worldwide survey that McKinsey recently conducted with 7300 senior executives, it was found that almost 80% are of the opinion that outsourcing is good for the global economy. But only 58% of US senior executives believe it is a good phenomenon. The latest on the US elections gives another perspective to the problem. The battle for the top job of the country now has John Kerry and John Edwards in the race, and the issue of outsourcing is one major player in the field. The issue is being used to whip up votes but like politicians anywhere, they will use it only as long as it suits them, Those who are actually effected by the outsourcing of jobs are least likely to be effected by their rhetoric, and whoever wins or loses the elections, it will be ultimately the common man who will be effected. UN agencies like UNCTAD continue to assert that outsourcing is a legitimate part of international trade, but then again, who is to decide the right balance between profits and manpower welfare? As secretary general of UNCTAD Rubens Ricupero has been reported as saying, "Off shoring was a legitimate part of global trade liberalization, and this enabled developing countries to leverage their competitive advantage -- abundant, competitive labor and lower cost environment." The global outsourcing spend is estimated to be $320 billion, which should go up to $585 billion by next year and $827 billion by 2008. It will not be easy for the US economy, nor the citizens to adapt to this paradigm shift in skill sets and jobs. There will be trauma, layoffs as well as refurbishing and training involved, but they will just have to do it. There's no escaping the roll now, the business economics is making just too much sense for any company to backtrack. What has to be considered is that the 'India outsourcing' is giving US an immense opportunity, to turn the tide in their favor. Handling the reverse brain drain rightly, will turn the tables in the favor of the US economy, while making a hue and cry about lost opportunities and lost jobs will not!! It is an ideal opportunity for the US to make ideal business partners out of one of the most populous and industrious country in the world, specially given the fact that it also has a brainpower that in many ways far exceeds that in the US. http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/3-9-2004-51445.asp Un article de Wikipdia, l'encyclopdie libre.
Wikipdia ne possde pas d'article avec ce nom. Cherchez Tlcommunications ACN sur un des projets-frres de Wikipdia: Wiktionnaire (dictionnaire) Wikibooks (livres pdagogiques) Wikiquote (citations) Wikisource (bibliothque universelle) Wikinews (actualits libres) Wikiversity (communaut pdagogique) Commons (images et mdias) Wikivoyage (guides de voyage) Wikidata (base de donnes) Soit vous avez mal crit le titre: Recherchez Tlcommunications dans les autres articles (aide). Consultez la liste des articles dont le titre commence ainsi. Cherchez d'autres pages de Wikipdia pointant vers ce titre. Soit l'article n'existe pas encore: Crez l'article: en wikicode ou avec l'diteur visuel (aide), ou demandez sa cration. Recherchez cet article dans d'autres langues, grce l'outil Global Wikipedia Article Search (en anglais). Notes pour les rdacteurs: Si vous avez rcemment cr cet article et qu'il apparat toujours vide, essayez de purger le cache ou d'attendre quelques minutes avant d'essayer de le recrer. L'article a peut-tre t supprim: si tel est ACN le cas, l'historique des effacements est affich ci-dessus. Il peut aussi avoir t renomm sans cration d'une redirection, juge inutile. Ce document provient de https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tlcommunications. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tlcommunications NEW YORK (CNNfn) - Accenture Ltd., the world's biggest consulting firm, gained nearly 5 percent in its market debut on the New York Stock Exchange Thursday. Accenture opened ACN at $15.10, hit a high of $15.25 before closing at $15.17 on the Big Board. The week's first IPO, Accenture (ACN: up $0.67 to $15.17, Research, Estimates) raised nearly $1.7 billion Wednesday when it sold 115 million shares at $14.50 each, near the top of its expected range of $13 to $15. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley served as lead underwriters. Don Luskin, CEO of Metamarket.com, spoke to CNNfn about the viability of the Accenture IPO. [349 AIFF] or [[349 WAV] The high-profile IPO has received relatively little attention. "Nobody cares about it," said market analyst Kyle Huske, of IPO.com. "The IPO market is pretty quiet." Accenture's small gain is connected to the poor performance of rival KPMG Consulting Inc. (KCIN: up $0.09 to $14.15, Research, Estimates) , which went public in February and rose 30 percent in its first day. KPMG shares have fallen off since, trading below its $18 offer price. "KPMG is the clear comparable. Most of KPMG's life as a public company has been below its offering price," Huske said. At $2 billion, KPMG's IPO was bigger than Accenture and still managed to score a higher premium in its first day. The market for new issues was also much harder in February -- when KPMG chose to go public -- than the current period, Huske said. With corporate results reports dominating the market, the Accenture IPO is getting lost in the shuffle. "The most interesting thing about Accenture is that it hasn't gotten much attention," Huske said. "It's really a non-event." The Accenture IPO ranks as the sixth-largest IPO this year, behind the $2.3 billion offering from KMPG, the $1.8 billion issue from Reliant Resources Inc. (RRI: down $1.20 to $22.90, Research, Estimates) and three others, according to data from Dealogic, an investment banking firm that tracks new issues. Accenture, with headquarters in both Bermuda and Palo Alto, Calif., provides management and technology consulting to customers such as Allianz AG (AZ: up $0.60 to $28.00, Research, Estimates), J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM: up $0.12 to $43.70, Research, Estimates), Ford Motor Co. (F: up $0.30 to $25.64, Research, Estimates) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ: down $0.20 to $54.20, Research, Estimates) . Accenture, formerly known as Andersen ACN Consulting, gained its freedom from parent Andersen Worldwide last August. The company had been involved in a bitter dispute over being forced to share its profit with sister firm Arthur Andersen, the global accounting firm. Andersen Consulting changed its name to Accenture on Jan. 1 as a result of that split. Accenture partners are not selling shares in the IPO and will hold 82 percent of the company's voting power once the offering is completed. Accenture is immensely profitable, posting $1.5 billion in operating income on $10.1 billion in revenue for the nine-month period ended May 31. http://money.cnn.com/2001/07/19/deals/accenture/index.htm I recently applied for a "home bundle" from a large telecommunications company which pretty much has the monopoly on such services. The "home bundle" was a combination of cable TV, cable broadband and my home telephone service. A few calculations resulted in this being the most cost effective solution for me at the time.
My first tentative enquires by email were answered http://www.china-led-manufacturer.com/LedBulbs/house-led-bulbs promptly and they were very helpful. They called me the day after and I explained what I wanted. Once again, no problems there and the pleasant young lady on the other end of the phone read back my requirements and we settled all the details. My first premonition of disaster struck when, near the end of the phone call, she said, "Our multiple specialist team will contact you within 24 hours." I hung up wondering what the hell a "multiple specialist team" was. Did it mean they were specialists and there were a few of them, or did it mean they were specialists in multiple areas which, in my experience, is an impossibility. Anyway, I didn't comment and awaited the phone call. Of course, the phone call never eventuated. Four days later I emailed again. The young man who answered my email was very helpful and polite when he wrote the multiple specialist team had tried to contact me multiple times but they were not able to do so they cancelled my order. I asked what phone numbers the multiple specialist team had called. There were no calls on my home or mobile phone. No missed calls either. Clearly the multiple specialist team were not specialists in the art lying and covering their http://dolphinhouse.org/2013/12/ tracks. The young man replaced my order and promised to email again if there were any problems. I received another email from the nice young man the same day. This was to advise me that the delay was due to an availability check having to be conducted to ascertain whether the cable service was available at my address. Now this is interesting, I wrote in my reply. Not only was I advised that cable service was available at my address, I also currently have cable at my address provided by your company. His reply was they were aware of that, but the availability check has to be done as a matter of procedure. I was then asked to email him back if I had not heard from the multiple specialist team in the next 48 hours. I didn't hear from them. I emailed the nice young man back and, to cut a long story short, he advised me that the multiple specialist team were still waiting on results of the availability check and I should here from them "next Monday or Tuesday". It was a Friday. I didn't hear from them Monday or Tuesday. On the Tuesday I received a letter from the company. One of the paragraphs was titled "Here's what you signed up for" I read it and it wasn't what I signed up for at all. I emailed the nice young man again and he called and spoke to my wife. (The email I sent was polite but scathingly sarcastic). The end result is that I now sit here and wait for a supervisor to contact me. They said it would be within 48 hours. What do you think the chances of that are? He's got another hour...... http://www.infobarrel.com/Telecommunications_and_Customer_Service |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2018
Categories |